• Journals
  • EDAMBA
  • Statement of publication ethics and peer review policies

Statement of publication ethics and peer review policies

Author, editor, reviewer, publisher are committed to adhere to the Code of Ethics of the University of Economics in Bratislava: https://euba.sk/en/university/code-of-ethics

 

Publishing process

The EDAMBA conference chair and the editor of Proceedings EDAMBA are responsible for overseeing all phases of the publishing process. 

Papers are to be submitted by May 15 of every year.

Notification of acceptance for conference presentation is sent by July 1 every year.

It is assumed that manuscripts have not yet been published or submitted for publishing elsewhere.

To ensure that all submitted papers are subject to the CrossRef Similarity Check with the use of iThenticate software. 

All submitted papers are subject to a double-blind peer review process.

The review process take approximately 4-6 weeks.

After completing the review process, the article can be accepted for publication, or is subject to minor or major revision, or rejected.

Each proceeding gets his own registration number ISBN every year.

The EDAMBA Proceedings is published open access with License Agreement signed by each author.

License Agreement Template

Papers are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. International (CC BY 4.0) and its content is freely available without charge on the University of Economics website.

Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the material published in the proceedings.

 

Author´s Ethics

  • The author is not allowed to publish the same manuscript in more journals/publications.
  • The author submits an original piece of work based on actual research and this information verifies in the process of the plagiarism check - CrossRef Similarity Check (tool iThenticate).
  • The author has the right of publication from all co-authors (in case paper has more co-authors).
  • The author agrees with editorial process.
  • The author must list correct and full citations of other authors´ works using the Template for the paper and the citation method Standard ISO 690.
  • The author is required to acknowledge all sources of research funding.
  • If authors finds a serious mistake, they are obliged to inform editor to correct the paper ASAP.

 

Reviewer´s Ethics

  • The reviewer handles the manuscripts regarding their content and scientific quality.
  • The reviewer maintains confidentiality about all information about the content of the contribution and the author.
  • The reviewer is objective in evaluation process and does the review personally.
  • The reviewer expresses opinions expertly, clearly, comprehensibly and adequately substaintiates them with arguments.
  • The reviewer´s comments help the author to improve the paper.
  • The reviewer delivers the review report within the deadline.
  • The reviewer should not evaluate papers where there could be a conflict of interest.

 

Editor´s Ethics

  • The editor evaluates whether the contribution meets the formal and content criteria of the EDAMBA event.
  • The editor accepts contribution from all authors and maintains confidentiality about their personal information and the content of their contributions.
  • The editor sends papers to 2 reviewers who are not in contact and who are not in contact with author of the paper.
  • The editor keeps the names of reviewers confidential and does not inform the author or both reviewers about them.
  • The editor informs the author about the outcome of the review without delay.
  • The editor immediately informs the reviewers about the deadline for submission of review reports.
  • Editor places contributions in the collection after a successful review process.
  • The editor refrains from evaluating articles where there could be a conflict of interest.
  • The editor will withdraw the paper before publication or publish a correction (errata) in case of confirmation of the legitimacy of complaint.